Brand | Western Digital |
---|---|
Item Model Number | WDS500G3X0C |
Hardware Platform | PC |
Product Dimensions | 2.2 x 8 x 0.24 cm; 7.71 Grams |
Item Dimensions L x W x H | 22 x 80 x 2 millimetres |
Colour | Black |
Flash Memory Size | 500 |
Batteries | 1 Lithium ion batteries required. |
Item Weight | 7.71 g |
Manufacturer | Western Digital AU |
ASIN | B07MH2P5ZD |
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer | No |
Date First Available | 18 January 2019 |
Other Sellers on Amazon
$93.91
+ $7.55 delivery
+ $7.55 delivery
Sold by:
Amazon US
$133.95
+ $8.00 delivery
+ $8.00 delivery
Sold by:
eDepot Australia
$150.00
+ FREE Delivery
+ FREE Delivery
Sold by:
KS Computer
Western Digital AU 500GB WD BLACK SN750 NVMe SSD, WDS500G3X0C
Price: | $99.00 & FREE Delivery |
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others.
Learn more
Brand | Western Digital |
Digital Storage Capacity | 500 GB |
Hardware Interface | PCI |
Read Speed | 3430 Megabytes Per Second |
Compatible Devices | Desktop |
About this item
- Available in capacities ranging from 250GB to 2TB
- An exclusive WD BLACK SSD dashboard with gaming mode improves game performance
- Read speeds up to 3 470MB/s2 500GB 1TB models for improved load times
Get 90 days FREE of Amazon Music Unlimited
with the purchase of any eligible product. Shop now
Product Information
Style Name:SSD | Capacity:500GBTechnical Details
Additional Information
Customer Reviews |
4.8 out of 5 stars |
---|---|
Best Sellers Rank |
4,523 in Computers (See Top 100 in Computers)
87 in Internal Solid State Drives |
Warranty & Support
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
- Western Digital WDS100T2B0C Blue SN550 1TB NVMe SSD 2400MB/s 1950MB/s R/W 600TBW 410K/405K IOPS M.2 2280 PCIe Gen 3 1.7M hrs MTTF 5yrs wty
- Samsung 970 EVO SSD 500GB - M.2 NVMe Interface Internal Solid State Drive with V-NAND Technology (MZ-V7E500BW), Black/Red
- Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD 500GB - M.2 NVMe Interface Internal Solid State Drive with V-NAND Technology (MZ-V7S500B/AM)
- Crucial P2 500GB 3D NAND NVMe PCIe M.2 SSD,CT500P2SSD8
- Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500GB, 64L 3-bit, MZ-V7S500BW
- Crucial® P5 1000GB 3D NAND NVMe™ PCIe® M.2 SSD, CT1000P5SSD8
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
- Western Digital WDS100T2B0C Blue SN550 1TB NVMe SSD 2400MB/s 1950MB/s R/W 600TBW 410K/405K IOPS M.2 2280 PCIe Gen 3 1.7M hrs MTTF 5yrs wty
- Western Digital WDS500G2B0C Blue SN550 500GB NVMe SSD 2400MB/s 1750MB/s R/W 300TBW 300K/240K IOPS M.2 2280 PCIe Gen 3 1.7M hrs MTTF 5yrs wty
- Crucial® P5 1000GB 3D NAND NVMe™ PCIe® M.2 SSD, CT1000P5SSD8
- Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500GB, 64L 3-bit, MZ-V7S500BW
- Corsair CP-9020179-AU RMX Series. RM750x 80 Plus Gold Fully Modular ATX Power Supply, Black, 750W
- Crucial Ballistix Gaming Memory, 2x8GB (16GB Kit) DDR4 3600MT/s CL16 Unbuffered DIMM 288pin Black, (PC4-19200), DDR4, BL2K8G36C16U4B
Have a question?
Find answers in product info, Q&As, reviews
Your question might be answered by sellers, manufacturers, or customers who bought this product.
Please make sure that you've entered a valid question. You can edit your question or post anyway.
Please enter a question.
Product description
Style Name:SSD
|
Capacity:500GB
The WD BLACK SN750 NVMe SSD delivers top-tier performance for gaming and hardware enthusiasts who are looking to build or upgrade their PC. Available in capacities up to 2TB, the WD BLACK SN750 NVMe SSD rivals some of the best performing drives on the market to help give gamers that competitive edge.
From the manufacturer





Portable game drives
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Customer reviews
4.8 out of 5 stars
4.8 out of 5
12,846 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Read reviews that mention
Top reviews
Top reviews from Australia
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in Australia on 13 July 2020
Report abuse
Style Name: SSDCapacity: 1TBVerified Purchase
I have received the package and it is clearly saying the item is WD Blue Sata SDD 500GB, however, someone attached an add-on label and try to pretend that it is "WD Black SN750 1TB NVMe"
9 people found this helpful
Helpful
TOP 50 REVIEWER
Style Name: SSDCapacity: 1TBVerified Purchase
Good value Nvme drive for those wanting that little extra performance boost. Installation was relatively quick and straightforward.
Please note: if you're using this as a second nvme drive, you'll need to go into your system settings, 'initiate' the drive, and then format it. Otherwise it won't show up automatically in 'my computer'.
Please note: if you're using this as a second nvme drive, you'll need to go into your system settings, 'initiate' the drive, and then format it. Otherwise it won't show up automatically in 'my computer'.
5 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in Australia on 22 June 2020
Style Name: SSDCapacity: 1TBVerified Purchase
Short Review:
This NVME SSD performs great, I've had it in my machine for a few days now, running a variety of programs and it has yet to disappoint! It is pricey as of the moment and most people would actually be better off with a SATA based SSD given that the difference is not very noticeable.
Long Review:
I'm a Software Developer and avid gamer, I use my machine daily and need a drive that is both fast and reliable, while also being affordable. The Western Digital 1TB Black is fantastic, it has been in my machine for a few days and has consistently performed well (reaching 3000+ MB/s comfortably!). I don't have any active cooling on the drive, so it is great to see that it isn't overheating in my machine, despite the amount of usage that the drive actually gets. Overall, although I'm extremely satisfied with the drive, given its current price is $200+ for 1TB, I would suggest possibly waiting for the price to drop/purchasing a SATA drive instead. The performance is good but, at least in the real world, it is not noticeably better than a SATA drive for most things (if not all!).
This NVME SSD performs great, I've had it in my machine for a few days now, running a variety of programs and it has yet to disappoint! It is pricey as of the moment and most people would actually be better off with a SATA based SSD given that the difference is not very noticeable.
Long Review:
I'm a Software Developer and avid gamer, I use my machine daily and need a drive that is both fast and reliable, while also being affordable. The Western Digital 1TB Black is fantastic, it has been in my machine for a few days and has consistently performed well (reaching 3000+ MB/s comfortably!). I don't have any active cooling on the drive, so it is great to see that it isn't overheating in my machine, despite the amount of usage that the drive actually gets. Overall, although I'm extremely satisfied with the drive, given its current price is $200+ for 1TB, I would suggest possibly waiting for the price to drop/purchasing a SATA drive instead. The performance is good but, at least in the real world, it is not noticeably better than a SATA drive for most things (if not all!).
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in Australia on 19 July 2020
Style Name: SSDCapacity: 500GBVerified Purchase
The ssd worked perfectly. Easy to install and did not require any modification either in the BIOS or within the windows to make it work. The only issue is faced was while trying to install Acronis WD, it kept telling me the software should be associated with WD product!!
Also, the SSD software needs some work with regards to the interface.
Overall, the performance is really great.
Also, the SSD software needs some work with regards to the interface.
Overall, the performance is really great.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in Australia on 5 January 2021
Style Name: SSDCapacity: 500GBVerified Purchase
This is an excellent device and excellent value for money! We use it as a secondary storage for games and photographs. Installation on a motherboard is simple and the only matter, as it was noted by other users, this SSD has to be initiated/formated before its use. Highly recommended!
Reviewed in Australia on 8 August 2020
Style Name: SSDCapacity: 1TBVerified Purchase
Figured I would dedicate this drive to COD Warzone since thats why I built a PC around. Almost first into all lobbies - so yes it loads quick. No doubt will be better served to larger games the take longer to load and it will be later on. App isn't bad either. Overall rock solid quality but at a price.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in Australia on 8 January 2021
Style Name: SSDCapacity: 500GBVerified Purchase
WD certainly delivers here. I have now purchased several SN750 cards and find the value for money incredible. The card is fast. It was fitted and operated Windows 10 in minutes with absolutely no issues. All SN750's I have purchased have had consistent fast, solid benchmarks in read/write categories. I can't praise this unit enough. For $99.00AU its a steal.
My review based on use with Ryzen 2000 & 3000 series CPU's / B450 MSI & Gigabyte motherboards.
My review based on use with Ryzen 2000 & 3000 series CPU's / B450 MSI & Gigabyte motherboards.
Reviewed in Australia on 7 January 2021
Style Name: SSDCapacity: 1TBVerified Purchase
This is an amazing drives. Works flawlessly in ASUS ARION external enclosure.
It doesn't get too hot when installed in an aluminium enclosure with thermal pads.
If I were to install it on the motherboard I'd consider getting a heatsink version.
It doesn't get too hot when installed in an aluminium enclosure with thermal pads.
If I were to install it on the motherboard I'd consider getting a heatsink version.
Top reviews from other countries

Georgios S
3.0 out of 5 stars
Don't buy if you want software without ads
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 25 September 2019Style Name: SSDCapacity: 500GBVerified Purchase
I'm not going to comment on speed or ease of installation as there are many reviews already about all that. I cannot comment on reliability either as I've just purchased it. So my 3 star rating is based on the WD software which has a side panel on the right running WD adverts, with no option of disabling. Every time it loads a new set of ads, it makes the software unresponsive for 3-4 seconds which is highly irritating. By comparison, the Samsung Magician software is my cleaner and slot less intrusive. So on that fact alone, I can't recommend WD. Maybe I'm being harsh, but force-feeding ads is certainly unacceptable.
185 people found this helpful
Report abuse

Rompetechos
5.0 out of 5 stars
Muy bueno. Excelente rapidez.
Reviewed in Spain on 12 August 2019Style Name: SSDCapacity: 500GBVerified Purchase
Me he comprado uno de estos en 500GB para el portátil y 2
Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe 1TB
para el sobremesa.
Aún teniendo en cuenta que las versiones de 1TB suelen ser más rápidas siempre que sus contrapartidas de 500GB me gusta más el Samsung que el Western Digital.
Aunque el WD es muy rápido, incluso instalando el software de WD y poniéndolo en modo "gaming" el Samsung es algo más rápido que el WD. Así que a igualdad de precio recomendaría el Samsung.
No obstante el WD sigue siendo muy buena opción.
Adjunto benchmarks en texto del Samsung 970 evo plus 1TB, del WD SN750 500GB y de un Samsung 960 EVO por comparar.
Como veis en los números de abajo se ve que no falta mucho para topar con el límite teórico de PCIe 3.0 4x (3940MB/s) aunque va está PCIe 4.0 a la vuelta de la esquina con los Ryzen.
Las especificaciones técnicas del WD 500GB que se ven en la web las clava en cuanto a escritura y lectura secuenciales pero a las aleatorias con una cola de 32 y 8 hilos supuestamente debería dar las siguientes IOPS 420K lectura y 380K escritura y me está dando algo menos en escritura:
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 8) : 1737.966 MB/s [ 424308.1 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 8) : 1144.867 MB/s [ 279508.5 IOPS]
La durabilidad según fabricante en ambos modelos es la misma 300 TBW para los modelos de 500GB y 600 para los de 1TB. Esto equivale aproximadamente a una durabilidad de 5 años escribiendo una media de 164GB diarios, o dicho de otra forma, 10 años escribiendo 82GB diarios. Un plato es un plato y un vaso es un vaso pero es una cifra que en términos absolutos no es muy alta pero para el usuario medio es más que suficiente.
Os pongo los resultados del CrystalDiskMark 6.0.2. Podéis encontrar más info en la web:
==================================================
== Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe 1TB (Samsung NVMe driver) ==
==================================================
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 3442.279 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 3336.961 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1523.856 MB/s [ 372035.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 2385.903 MB/s [ 582495.8 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 577.528 MB/s [ 140998.0 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 521.467 MB/s [ 127311.3 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 47.828 MB/s [ 11676.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 159.248 MB/s [ 38878.9 IOPS]
Test : 4096 MiB [F: 0.0% (0.1/931.5 GiB)] (x3) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2019/08/10 0:19:27
OS : Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 18362] (x64)
==================================================
== Western Digital Black SN750 500GB NVMe (gaming mode) ==
==================================================
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 3229.756 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 2580.845 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1137.420 MB/s [ 277690.4 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1280.202 MB/s [ 312549.3 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 429.592 MB/s [ 104880.9 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 375.598 MB/s [ 91698.7 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 33.559 MB/s [ 8193.1 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 117.023 MB/s [ 28570.1 IOPS]
Test : 4096 MiB [C: 6.3% (29.2/465.1 GiB)] (x3) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2019/07/25 12:39:55
OS : Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 18362] (x64)
==============================
== Samsung 960 EVO NVMe 240GB ==
==============================
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 3259.338 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 1437.344 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1248.515 MB/s [ 304813.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 858.340 MB/s [ 209555.7 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 518.690 MB/s [ 126633.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 439.785 MB/s [ 107369.4 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 38.798 MB/s [ 9472.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 137.066 MB/s [ 33463.4 IOPS]
Test : 4096 MiB [C: 12.9% (30.1/232.3 GiB)] (x3) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2019/07/22 19:43:36
OS : Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 18362] (x64)
Aún teniendo en cuenta que las versiones de 1TB suelen ser más rápidas siempre que sus contrapartidas de 500GB me gusta más el Samsung que el Western Digital.
Aunque el WD es muy rápido, incluso instalando el software de WD y poniéndolo en modo "gaming" el Samsung es algo más rápido que el WD. Así que a igualdad de precio recomendaría el Samsung.
No obstante el WD sigue siendo muy buena opción.
Adjunto benchmarks en texto del Samsung 970 evo plus 1TB, del WD SN750 500GB y de un Samsung 960 EVO por comparar.
Como veis en los números de abajo se ve que no falta mucho para topar con el límite teórico de PCIe 3.0 4x (3940MB/s) aunque va está PCIe 4.0 a la vuelta de la esquina con los Ryzen.
Las especificaciones técnicas del WD 500GB que se ven en la web las clava en cuanto a escritura y lectura secuenciales pero a las aleatorias con una cola de 32 y 8 hilos supuestamente debería dar las siguientes IOPS 420K lectura y 380K escritura y me está dando algo menos en escritura:
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 8) : 1737.966 MB/s [ 424308.1 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 8) : 1144.867 MB/s [ 279508.5 IOPS]
La durabilidad según fabricante en ambos modelos es la misma 300 TBW para los modelos de 500GB y 600 para los de 1TB. Esto equivale aproximadamente a una durabilidad de 5 años escribiendo una media de 164GB diarios, o dicho de otra forma, 10 años escribiendo 82GB diarios. Un plato es un plato y un vaso es un vaso pero es una cifra que en términos absolutos no es muy alta pero para el usuario medio es más que suficiente.
Os pongo los resultados del CrystalDiskMark 6.0.2. Podéis encontrar más info en la web:
==================================================
== Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe 1TB (Samsung NVMe driver) ==
==================================================
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 3442.279 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 3336.961 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1523.856 MB/s [ 372035.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 2385.903 MB/s [ 582495.8 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 577.528 MB/s [ 140998.0 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 521.467 MB/s [ 127311.3 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 47.828 MB/s [ 11676.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 159.248 MB/s [ 38878.9 IOPS]
Test : 4096 MiB [F: 0.0% (0.1/931.5 GiB)] (x3) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2019/08/10 0:19:27
OS : Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 18362] (x64)
==================================================
== Western Digital Black SN750 500GB NVMe (gaming mode) ==
==================================================
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 3229.756 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 2580.845 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1137.420 MB/s [ 277690.4 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1280.202 MB/s [ 312549.3 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 429.592 MB/s [ 104880.9 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 375.598 MB/s [ 91698.7 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 33.559 MB/s [ 8193.1 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 117.023 MB/s [ 28570.1 IOPS]
Test : 4096 MiB [C: 6.3% (29.2/465.1 GiB)] (x3) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2019/07/25 12:39:55
OS : Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 18362] (x64)
==============================
== Samsung 960 EVO NVMe 240GB ==
==============================
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 3259.338 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 1437.344 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1248.515 MB/s [ 304813.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 858.340 MB/s [ 209555.7 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 518.690 MB/s [ 126633.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 439.785 MB/s [ 107369.4 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 38.798 MB/s [ 9472.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 137.066 MB/s [ 33463.4 IOPS]
Test : 4096 MiB [C: 12.9% (30.1/232.3 GiB)] (x3) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2019/07/22 19:43:36
OS : Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 18362] (x64)

5.0 out of 5 stars
Muy bueno. Excelente rapidez.
Reviewed in Spain on 12 August 2019
Me he comprado uno de estos en 500GB para el portátil y 2 [[ASIN:B07MBQPQ62 Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe 1TB]] para el sobremesa.Reviewed in Spain on 12 August 2019
Aún teniendo en cuenta que las versiones de 1TB suelen ser más rápidas siempre que sus contrapartidas de 500GB me gusta más el Samsung que el Western Digital.
Aunque el WD es muy rápido, incluso instalando el software de WD y poniéndolo en modo "gaming" el Samsung es algo más rápido que el WD. Así que a igualdad de precio recomendaría el Samsung.
No obstante el WD sigue siendo muy buena opción.
Adjunto benchmarks en texto del Samsung 970 evo plus 1TB, del WD SN750 500GB y de un Samsung 960 EVO por comparar.
Como veis en los números de abajo se ve que no falta mucho para topar con el límite teórico de PCIe 3.0 4x (3940MB/s) aunque va está PCIe 4.0 a la vuelta de la esquina con los Ryzen.
Las especificaciones técnicas del WD 500GB que se ven en la web las clava en cuanto a escritura y lectura secuenciales pero a las aleatorias con una cola de 32 y 8 hilos supuestamente debería dar las siguientes IOPS 420K lectura y 380K escritura y me está dando algo menos en escritura:
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 8) : 1737.966 MB/s [ 424308.1 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 8) : 1144.867 MB/s [ 279508.5 IOPS]
La durabilidad según fabricante en ambos modelos es la misma 300 TBW para los modelos de 500GB y 600 para los de 1TB. Esto equivale aproximadamente a una durabilidad de 5 años escribiendo una media de 164GB diarios, o dicho de otra forma, 10 años escribiendo 82GB diarios. Un plato es un plato y un vaso es un vaso pero es una cifra que en términos absolutos no es muy alta pero para el usuario medio es más que suficiente.
Os pongo los resultados del CrystalDiskMark 6.0.2. Podéis encontrar más info en la web:
==================================================
== Samsung 970 EVO Plus NVMe 1TB (Samsung NVMe driver) ==
==================================================
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 3442.279 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 3336.961 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1523.856 MB/s [ 372035.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 2385.903 MB/s [ 582495.8 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 577.528 MB/s [ 140998.0 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 521.467 MB/s [ 127311.3 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 47.828 MB/s [ 11676.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 159.248 MB/s [ 38878.9 IOPS]
Test : 4096 MiB [F: 0.0% (0.1/931.5 GiB)] (x3) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2019/08/10 0:19:27
OS : Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 18362] (x64)
==================================================
== Western Digital Black SN750 500GB NVMe (gaming mode) ==
==================================================
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 3229.756 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 2580.845 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1137.420 MB/s [ 277690.4 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1280.202 MB/s [ 312549.3 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 429.592 MB/s [ 104880.9 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 375.598 MB/s [ 91698.7 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 33.559 MB/s [ 8193.1 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 117.023 MB/s [ 28570.1 IOPS]
Test : 4096 MiB [C: 6.3% (29.2/465.1 GiB)] (x3) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2019/07/25 12:39:55
OS : Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 18362] (x64)
==============================
== Samsung 960 EVO NVMe 240GB ==
==============================
Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) : 3259.338 MB/s
Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) : 1437.344 MB/s
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 1248.515 MB/s [ 304813.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 8,T= 8) : 858.340 MB/s [ 209555.7 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 518.690 MB/s [ 126633.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) : 439.785 MB/s [ 107369.4 IOPS]
Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 38.798 MB/s [ 9472.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) : 137.066 MB/s [ 33463.4 IOPS]
Test : 4096 MiB [C: 12.9% (30.1/232.3 GiB)] (x3) [Interval=5 sec]
Date : 2019/07/22 19:43:36
OS : Windows 10 Professional [10.0 Build 18362] (x64)
Images in this review





Rahul Parashar
5.0 out of 5 stars
Beast but not useful if you have sata ssd already
Reviewed in India on 29 July 2019Style Name: SSDCapacity: 500GBVerified Purchase
This beast is very very fast
But the funny thing is I can't see the improvement in my system speed after upgrading to this beast from my Intel ssd
After spending that much amount on just 500 gb nvme ssd I learnt that my games and my system was not bottlenecked by ssd speed
Yes nvme is fast but its useless for normal person
My games run the same, pc boots in same time, can't see improvement by naked eyes
And most funny thing if you are gonna copy something to this nvme drive it will not gonna give that 3GBps speed as other device will bottleneck it from which you ar copying data 😂😂 now I don't know how can I make use of this speed.
Lesson learnt after wasting money
I could have bought 1tb sata ssd instead of this in same price
But the funny thing is I can't see the improvement in my system speed after upgrading to this beast from my Intel ssd
After spending that much amount on just 500 gb nvme ssd I learnt that my games and my system was not bottlenecked by ssd speed
Yes nvme is fast but its useless for normal person
My games run the same, pc boots in same time, can't see improvement by naked eyes
And most funny thing if you are gonna copy something to this nvme drive it will not gonna give that 3GBps speed as other device will bottleneck it from which you ar copying data 😂😂 now I don't know how can I make use of this speed.
Lesson learnt after wasting money
I could have bought 1tb sata ssd instead of this in same price
80 people found this helpful
Report abuse

Gianni
5.0 out of 5 stars
UTILIZZATO IN COMBINAZIONE CON UN ADATTATORE PCI EXPRESS SUPER ECONOMICO CON OTTIMI RISULTATI.
Reviewed in Italy on 16 April 2019Style Name: SSDCapacity: 250GBVerified Purchase
Come sempre spero di esserti stato utile, il tuo giudizio per me è importante.

Lynchie435
2.0 out of 5 stars
Faulty within 3 Months
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 8 May 2019Style Name: SSDCapacity: 500GBVerified Purchase
I work in IT myself and have built my own computers and recently switched back to using a laptop as having a child means I can't go sit in my office :).
I bought this to increase the storage space on my laptop, not a problem fit perfectly fine however I've had constant BSOD (Blue Screen of Death) issues pertaining to Driver Violations since I have installed this SSD.
I ruled out the possibility of my laptop by performing a full re-format on my machine, I then tested my theory by installing NOTHING on the second SDD (WD Black) and not had any issues, then decided to put a 30GB Game on there to test how the SSD would perform within 10 minutes I had a BSOD.
Unfortunately for me I'm well outside my purchase period however I am going to complain as this is disgraceful, in the mean time I have ordered a Samsung EVO 970 instead as my original SSD was Samsung, may as well pay the extra few quid to have a performing piece of kit.
I bought this to increase the storage space on my laptop, not a problem fit perfectly fine however I've had constant BSOD (Blue Screen of Death) issues pertaining to Driver Violations since I have installed this SSD.
I ruled out the possibility of my laptop by performing a full re-format on my machine, I then tested my theory by installing NOTHING on the second SDD (WD Black) and not had any issues, then decided to put a 30GB Game on there to test how the SSD would perform within 10 minutes I had a BSOD.
Unfortunately for me I'm well outside my purchase period however I am going to complain as this is disgraceful, in the mean time I have ordered a Samsung EVO 970 instead as my original SSD was Samsung, may as well pay the extra few quid to have a performing piece of kit.
36 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Get FREE delivery with Amazon Prime
Prime members enjoy FREE Delivery and exclusive access to movies, TV shows, music, Kindle e-books, Twitch Prime, and more.